| Author |
Message |
Jeff Kite
Guest
|
Posted:
Wed Nov 09, 2005 8:23 am Post subject:
In Place upgrade from SBS 2000 to Server 2003 |
|
|
I have a site with 2 servers. They were properly licensed, I purchased both
SBS 2000 and server 2000 (serving the role of Terminal Server). I used the
same media to install both servers. On the SBS, I did the full SBS 2000
install. On the terminal server, I used the same media, but only did the
base OS install. It has all worked fine for years. NOW - I have
successfully in-place upgraded the SBS 2000 to SBS 2003. Next - I want to
upgrade the terminal server 2000 to server 2003. When I try to run the
install, I get a message that this upgrade connot proceed.
Is there a reg change or a file change that will solve this.
Thanks in advance,
Jeff Kite |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
John Oliver, Jr. [MVP]
Guest
|
Posted:
Wed Nov 09, 2005 8:57 am Post subject:
Re: In Place upgrade from SBS 2000 to Server 2003 |
|
|
Have you licensed your Standard Windows 2003 Server? You will need purchase
a License for this and media kit. You should also be aware that Terminal
Server Licensing has changed in Server 2003. You will need to purchase
separate TS CALS for this to work properly.
http://www.microsoft.com/windowsserver2003/community/centers/terminal/terminal_faq.mspx
--
John Oliver, Jr.
MCSE, MCT, CCNA, Exchange MVP
Microsoft Certified Partner
"Jeff Kite" <Jeff Kite@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:BFE7D78F-867B-4280-B639-DA4B6F13D931@microsoft.com...
| Quote: | I have a site with 2 servers. They were properly licensed, I purchased
both
SBS 2000 and server 2000 (serving the role of Terminal Server). I used
the
same media to install both servers. On the SBS, I did the full SBS 2000
install. On the terminal server, I used the same media, but only did the
base OS install. It has all worked fine for years. NOW - I have
successfully in-place upgraded the SBS 2000 to SBS 2003. Next - I want to
upgrade the terminal server 2000 to server 2003. When I try to run the
install, I get a message that this upgrade connot proceed.
Is there a reg change or a file change that will solve this.
Thanks in advance,
Jeff Kite
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Cris Hanna [SBS-MVP]
Guest
|
Posted:
Wed Nov 09, 2005 9:51 pm Post subject:
Re: In Place upgrade from SBS 2000 to Server 2003 |
|
|
I'm going to be more blunt
You're first set up was completely illegal...well ok, your SBS server was
probably ok
But you cannot use the SBS media to install additional servers..never could.
So, buy yourself a legal copy of windows server 2003 and off you go.
--
Cris Hanna [SBS-MVP]
-----------------------------------------------
Please do not contact me directly. Please only repond here in the newsgroup
for the benefit of all.
"Jeff Kite" <Jeff Kite@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:BFE7D78F-867B-4280-B639-DA4B6F13D931@microsoft.com...
| Quote: | I have a site with 2 servers. They were properly licensed, I purchased
both
SBS 2000 and server 2000 (serving the role of Terminal Server). I used
the
same media to install both servers. On the SBS, I did the full SBS 2000
install. On the terminal server, I used the same media, but only did the
base OS install. It has all worked fine for years. NOW - I have
successfully in-place upgraded the SBS 2000 to SBS 2003. Next - I want to
upgrade the terminal server 2000 to server 2003. When I try to run the
install, I get a message that this upgrade connot proceed.
Is there a reg change or a file change that will solve this.
Thanks in advance,
Jeff Kite
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Jeff Kite
Guest
|
Posted:
Thu Nov 10, 2005 1:51 am Post subject:
RE: In Place upgrade from SBS 2000 to Server 2003 |
|
|
OK Cris and John. Your bluntness was of no help. As I indicated, this
installation was properly licensed, and I have both media sets. I just did
not bother to open the server 2000 media to install the terminal server. The
SBS 2000 media installed and worked just fine (for years).
Now - if someone has a suggestion on how to get SBS 2000 base OS install
(which is currently acting as a terminal server) to inplace upgrade to server
2003 - that would be very helpfull.
"Jeff Kite" wrote:
| Quote: | I have a site with 2 servers. They were properly licensed, I purchased both
SBS 2000 and server 2000 (serving the role of Terminal Server). I used the
same media to install both servers. On the SBS, I did the full SBS 2000
install. On the terminal server, I used the same media, but only did the
base OS install. It has all worked fine for years. NOW - I have
successfully in-place upgraded the SBS 2000 to SBS 2003. Next - I want to
upgrade the terminal server 2000 to server 2003. When I try to run the
install, I get a message that this upgrade connot proceed.
Is there a reg change or a file change that will solve this.
Thanks in advance,
Jeff Kite
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Kevin Weilbacher [SBS-MVP
Guest
|
Posted:
Thu Nov 10, 2005 9:17 am Post subject:
Re: In Place upgrade from SBS 2000 to Server 2003 |
|
|
Well, you've now learned that the media sets are NOT the same. And unless
somebody knows something different, I'm afraid you may have to start from
scratch on that TS. But let me see what else we can find out for you.
--
Kevin Weilbacher [SBS-MVP]
"The days pass by so quickly now, the nights are seldom long"
"Jeff Kite" <JeffKite@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:9651966F-09E2-4331-8890-0EE0A81A7209@microsoft.com...
| Quote: | OK Cris and John. Your bluntness was of no help. As I indicated, this
installation was properly licensed, and I have both media sets. I just
did
not bother to open the server 2000 media to install the terminal server.
The
SBS 2000 media installed and worked just fine (for years).
Now - if someone has a suggestion on how to get SBS 2000 base OS install
(which is currently acting as a terminal server) to inplace upgrade to
server
2003 - that would be very helpfull.
"Jeff Kite" wrote:
I have a site with 2 servers. They were properly licensed, I purchased
both
SBS 2000 and server 2000 (serving the role of Terminal Server). I used
the
same media to install both servers. On the SBS, I did the full SBS 2000
install. On the terminal server, I used the same media, but only did the
base OS install. It has all worked fine for years. NOW - I have
successfully in-place upgraded the SBS 2000 to SBS 2003. Next - I want
to
upgrade the terminal server 2000 to server 2003. When I try to run the
install, I get a message that this upgrade connot proceed.
Is there a reg change or a file change that will solve this.
Thanks in advance,
Jeff Kite
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Cris Hanna [SBS-MVP]
Guest
|
Posted:
Fri Nov 11, 2005 1:50 am Post subject:
Re: In Place upgrade from SBS 2000 to Server 2003 |
|
|
Well Pardon Kevin and I for being blunt...again.
And I would suggest that if you read the EULA on your SBS media you'd find
that you can't legally use that media on a second server.
This has been passed around in the back channels and the consensus is that
there is no solution other than to format the drive and start over.
--
Cris Hanna [SBS-MVP]
-----------------------------------------------
Please do not contact me directly. Please only repond here in the newsgroup
for the benefit of all.
"Jeff Kite" <JeffKite@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:9651966F-09E2-4331-8890-0EE0A81A7209@microsoft.com...
| Quote: | OK Cris and John. Your bluntness was of no help. As I indicated, this
installation was properly licensed, and I have both media sets. I just
did
not bother to open the server 2000 media to install the terminal server.
The
SBS 2000 media installed and worked just fine (for years).
Now - if someone has a suggestion on how to get SBS 2000 base OS install
(which is currently acting as a terminal server) to inplace upgrade to
server
2003 - that would be very helpfull.
"Jeff Kite" wrote:
I have a site with 2 servers. They were properly licensed, I purchased
both
SBS 2000 and server 2000 (serving the role of Terminal Server). I used
the
same media to install both servers. On the SBS, I did the full SBS 2000
install. On the terminal server, I used the same media, but only did the
base OS install. It has all worked fine for years. NOW - I have
successfully in-place upgraded the SBS 2000 to SBS 2003. Next - I want
to
upgrade the terminal server 2000 to server 2003. When I try to run the
install, I get a message that this upgrade connot proceed.
Is there a reg change or a file change that will solve this.
Thanks in advance,
Jeff Kite
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Kathy Gilbert
Guest
|
Posted:
Fri Nov 11, 2005 9:50 pm Post subject:
Re: In Place upgrade from SBS 2000 to Server 2003 |
|
|
Well you should have taken as much time to read the posting as you took to
read the EULA and you would have seen that the guy said he had purchased
licenses for both server, just simply did not use the second set of software,
therefore, there has been NO licensing violation and nothing illegal about it.
"Cris Hanna [SBS-MVP]" wrote:
| Quote: | Well Pardon Kevin and I for being blunt...again.
And I would suggest that if you read the EULA on your SBS media you'd find
that you can't legally use that media on a second server.
This has been passed around in the back channels and the consensus is that
there is no solution other than to format the drive and start over.
--
Cris Hanna [SBS-MVP]
-----------------------------------------------
Please do not contact me directly. Please only repond here in the newsgroup
for the benefit of all.
"Jeff Kite" <JeffKite@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:9651966F-09E2-4331-8890-0EE0A81A7209@microsoft.com...
OK Cris and John. Your bluntness was of no help. As I indicated, this
installation was properly licensed, and I have both media sets. I just
did
not bother to open the server 2000 media to install the terminal server.
The
SBS 2000 media installed and worked just fine (for years).
Now - if someone has a suggestion on how to get SBS 2000 base OS install
(which is currently acting as a terminal server) to inplace upgrade to
server
2003 - that would be very helpfull.
"Jeff Kite" wrote:
I have a site with 2 servers. They were properly licensed, I purchased
both
SBS 2000 and server 2000 (serving the role of Terminal Server). I used
the
same media to install both servers. On the SBS, I did the full SBS 2000
install. On the terminal server, I used the same media, but only did the
base OS install. It has all worked fine for years. NOW - I have
successfully in-place upgraded the SBS 2000 to SBS 2003. Next - I want
to
upgrade the terminal server 2000 to server 2003. When I try to run the
install, I get a message that this upgrade connot proceed.
Is there a reg change or a file change that will solve this.
Thanks in advance,
Jeff Kite
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Steve
Guest
|
Posted:
Sat Nov 12, 2005 1:50 am Post subject:
Re: In Place upgrade from SBS 2000 to Server 2003 |
|
|
Sorry Kathy as Cris and the others have said you can't use the SBS media to
install only the Windows server portion on another server hardware and the
OP is being bitten now by his failure to abide by that. If he had originally
opened his properly licensed Windows server software and installed that all
would be fine.
"Kathy Gilbert" <Kathy Gilbert@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:D836532D-53C2-4177-90A5-B5230013849C@microsoft.com...
| Quote: | Well you should have taken as much time to read the posting as you took to
read the EULA and you would have seen that the guy said he had purchased
licenses for both server, just simply did not use the second set of
software,
therefore, there has been NO licensing violation and nothing illegal about
it.
"Cris Hanna [SBS-MVP]" wrote:
Well Pardon Kevin and I for being blunt...again.
And I would suggest that if you read the EULA on your SBS media you'd
find
that you can't legally use that media on a second server.
This has been passed around in the back channels and the consensus is
that
there is no solution other than to format the drive and start over.
--
Cris Hanna [SBS-MVP]
-----------------------------------------------
Please do not contact me directly. Please only repond here in the
newsgroup
for the benefit of all.
"Jeff Kite" <JeffKite@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:9651966F-09E2-4331-8890-0EE0A81A7209@microsoft.com...
OK Cris and John. Your bluntness was of no help. As I indicated, this
installation was properly licensed, and I have both media sets. I just
did
not bother to open the server 2000 media to install the terminal
server.
The
SBS 2000 media installed and worked just fine (for years).
Now - if someone has a suggestion on how to get SBS 2000 base OS
install
(which is currently acting as a terminal server) to inplace upgrade to
server
2003 - that would be very helpfull.
"Jeff Kite" wrote:
I have a site with 2 servers. They were properly licensed, I
purchased
both
SBS 2000 and server 2000 (serving the role of Terminal Server). I
used
the
same media to install both servers. On the SBS, I did the full SBS
2000
install. On the terminal server, I used the same media, but only did
the
base OS install. It has all worked fine for years. NOW - I have
successfully in-place upgraded the SBS 2000 to SBS 2003. Next - I
want
to
upgrade the terminal server 2000 to server 2003. When I try to run
the
install, I get a message that this upgrade connot proceed.
Is there a reg change or a file change that will solve this.
Thanks in advance,
Jeff Kite
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Kevin Weilbacher [SBS-MVP
Guest
|
Posted:
Sat Nov 12, 2005 7:52 am Post subject:
Re: In Place upgrade from SBS 2000 to Server 2003 |
|
|
Kathy, don't mean to dump on anyone, but using the SBS media to setup a
Windows only system is not only wrong, but as he found out, causes problems
in the long run. I truly wish there was an easier solution to provide him
for this situation, but there simply isn't -- he's going to need to reformat
and reload.
--
Kevin Weilbacher [SBS-MVP]
"The days pass by so quickly now, the nights are seldom long"
"Kathy Gilbert" <Kathy Gilbert@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:D836532D-53C2-4177-90A5-B5230013849C@microsoft.com...
| Quote: | Well you should have taken as much time to read the posting as you took to
read the EULA and you would have seen that the guy said he had purchased
licenses for both server, just simply did not use the second set of
software,
therefore, there has been NO licensing violation and nothing illegal about
it.
"Cris Hanna [SBS-MVP]" wrote:
Well Pardon Kevin and I for being blunt...again.
And I would suggest that if you read the EULA on your SBS media you'd
find
that you can't legally use that media on a second server.
This has been passed around in the back channels and the consensus is
that
there is no solution other than to format the drive and start over.
--
Cris Hanna [SBS-MVP]
-----------------------------------------------
Please do not contact me directly. Please only repond here in the
newsgroup
for the benefit of all.
"Jeff Kite" <JeffKite@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:9651966F-09E2-4331-8890-0EE0A81A7209@microsoft.com...
OK Cris and John. Your bluntness was of no help. As I indicated, this
installation was properly licensed, and I have both media sets. I just
did
not bother to open the server 2000 media to install the terminal
server.
The
SBS 2000 media installed and worked just fine (for years).
Now - if someone has a suggestion on how to get SBS 2000 base OS
install
(which is currently acting as a terminal server) to inplace upgrade to
server
2003 - that would be very helpfull.
"Jeff Kite" wrote:
I have a site with 2 servers. They were properly licensed, I
purchased
both
SBS 2000 and server 2000 (serving the role of Terminal Server). I
used
the
same media to install both servers. On the SBS, I did the full SBS
2000
install. On the terminal server, I used the same media, but only did
the
base OS install. It has all worked fine for years. NOW - I have
successfully in-place upgraded the SBS 2000 to SBS 2003. Next - I
want
to
upgrade the terminal server 2000 to server 2003. When I try to run
the
install, I get a message that this upgrade connot proceed.
Is there a reg change or a file change that will solve this.
Thanks in advance,
Jeff Kite
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
|
|