| Author |
Message |
Aaron
Guest
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Stefan [MSFT]
Guest
|
 Posted:
Mon Nov 07, 2005 5:50 pm Post subject:
Re: Is IIS 6 compression a good idea with MCMS? |
|
|
Hi Aaron,
on an authoring server it should not be used. There are some issues with
revision history comparison if compression is enabled.
On a read-only site this should be fine.
Cheers,
Stefan
--
This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights
New to MCMS?
Check out this book: Building Websites Using MCMS: http://tinyurl.com/6zj44
----------------------
"Aaron" <Aaron@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:21B734DB-337B-40CA-A2B7-30DA39C2F717@microsoft.com...
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Aaron
Guest
|
| Posted:
Mon Nov 07, 2005 9:51 pm Post subject:
Re: Is IIS 6 compression a good idea with MCMS? |
|
|
You are helpful as always Stefan!
Just to clarify, do you have any specifics so that I could test whether a
3rd party compression tool (such as JetNexus) has the same revision history
issues on the authoring server? We run in a combined RO/RW server...which I
know is not ideal but I have made that recomendation already.
Aaron
"Stefan [MSFT]" wrote:
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Stefan [MSFT]
Guest
|
| Posted:
Tue Nov 08, 2005 9:51 am Post subject:
Re: Is IIS 6 compression a good idea with MCMS? |
|
|
Hi Aaron,
just check if revision history comparison works or not.
If you get the result page with the compared content everything is fine.
Cheers,
Stefan
--
This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights
New to MCMS?
Check out this book: Building Websites Using MCMS: http://tinyurl.com/6zj44
----------------------
"Aaron" <Aaron@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:D36CC4C0-1187-4872-9656-F130D9DB99C5@microsoft.com...
| Quote: | You are helpful as always Stefan!
Just to clarify, do you have any specifics so that I could test whether a
3rd party compression tool (such as JetNexus) has the same revision
history
issues on the authoring server? We run in a combined RO/RW server...which
I
know is not ideal but I have made that recomendation already.
Aaron
"Stefan [MSFT]" wrote:
Hi Aaron,
on an authoring server it should not be used. There are some issues with
revision history comparison if compression is enabled.
On a read-only site this should be fine.
Cheers,
Stefan
--
This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no
rights
New to MCMS?
Check out this book: Building Websites Using MCMS:
http://tinyurl.com/6zj44
----------------------
"Aaron" <Aaron@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:21B734DB-337B-40CA-A2B7-30DA39C2F717@microsoft.com...
We use MCMS as a corporate intranet with many WAN links and global
sites.
We
are considering compression to use slightly less bandwidth and improve
delivery time. Searching the threads I only found 1 problem regarding
compression, but it had a work around:
http://www.microsoft.com/technet/community/newsgroups/dgbrowser/en-us/default.mspx?&query=compression&lang=en&cr=US&guid=&sloc=en-us&dg=microsoft.public.cmserver.general&p=1&tid=bcb507db-1b6e-4f23-a3ab-19c3e70b1c31&mid=bcb507db-1b6e-4f23-a3ab-19c3e70b1c31
Have you had a positive or negative experience with using IIS 6
compression
(or 3rd party) and MCMS? Please share...
Thanks in advance,
Aaron
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
|
FAQ
Memberlist
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in