| Author |
Message |
christian da ruos
Guest
|
Posted:
Mon Jan 31, 2005 6:46 am Post subject:
ACTIVE/ACTIVE SQL Server Cluster Model |
|
|
Does anyone have already implemented an active/active (multiple instance)
Sql Server Cluster ? What are the benefits/disvantages over an
active/passive mode ?
Thanks for your answers !
Chris |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Russ Kaufmann
Guest
|
Posted:
Mon Jan 31, 2005 6:46 am Post subject:
Re: ACTIVE/ACTIVE SQL Server Cluster Model |
|
|
"christian da ruos" <chris.daruos@sellys.com> wrote in message
news:%23bdEuu5BFHA.2076@TK2MSFTNGP15.phx.gbl...
| Quote: | Does anyone have already implemented an active/active (multiple instance)
Sql Server Cluster ? What are the benefits/disvantages over an
active/passive mode ?
|
I support two different sets of SQL clusters in an active-active
configuration.
Benefits - while in active-active, the performance is better with the
different SQL instances on different virtual servers on different nodes.
Disadvantage - performance take a major hit during a failure. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
christian da ruos
Guest
|
Posted:
Wed Feb 02, 2005 6:08 pm Post subject:
Re: ACTIVE/ACTIVE SQL Server Cluster Model |
|
|
Hi Russ,
Thanks for your answer.
I will be in charge of implement a cluster of 2 Sql Server 2000 but I am not
yet sure about
the choice I will do between active/active and active/passive mode.
Would it be possible for you to send me your configuration settings
(architecture) you are
running on your cluster ? Does your actual configuration give you full
satisfaction ? Is it
possible to use the cluster as a state server for asp.net applications ?
Best regards !
Chris
"Russ Kaufmann" <russ@exchangemct.com> wrote in message
news:u4n1jX7BFHA.824@TK2MSFTNGP11.phx.gbl...
| Quote: | "christian da ruos" <chris.daruos@sellys.com> wrote in message
news:%23bdEuu5BFHA.2076@TK2MSFTNGP15.phx.gbl...
Does anyone have already implemented an active/active (multiple instance)
Sql Server Cluster ? What are the benefits/disvantages over an
active/passive mode ?
I support two different sets of SQL clusters in an active-active
configuration.
Benefits - while in active-active, the performance is better with the
different SQL instances on different virtual servers on different nodes.
Disadvantage - performance take a major hit during a failure.
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Russ Kaufmann
Guest
|
Posted:
Thu Feb 03, 2005 12:19 am Post subject:
Re: ACTIVE/ACTIVE SQL Server Cluster Model |
|
|
"christian da ruos" <chris.daruos@sellys.com> wrote in message
news:O8taRASCFHA.1924@TK2MSFTNGP14.phx.gbl...
| Quote: | Would it be possible for you to send me your configuration settings
(architecture) you are
running on your cluster ?
|
Sorry, I can't. However, it really doesn't make a difference as each one is
pretty much the default setting. I don't think there are any changes from
default configurations.
| Quote: | Does your actual configuration give you full
satisfaction ?
|
No, I am still hungry. <G> Does it work? Absolutely. It runs very well.
| Quote: | Is it
possible to use the cluster as a state server for asp.net applications ?
|
You can use it for any purpose where you would normally use SQL. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
|
|