Bob Christian
Guest
|
 Posted:
Tue Jan 11, 2005 10:43 pm Post subject:
Re: Question on TCP and Mutual TLS |
|
|
Good to see you and Morpheous back.
Are these two LCS 2005 Standard Edition servers or two LCS 2005 Enterprise
Edition servers in an LCS 2005 Enterprise Pool? It does make a difference.
For now I will assume two LCS 2005 SE servers.
You do need to have either 5060(TCP) or 5061(TLS/MTLS) on your servers if
you need your clients to communicate to the server.
It is possible to change the port assignments (some use 443 for TLS/MTLS and
sever.domain.com:443 or pool.domain.com:443 (dependent upon whether they are
connecting to a LCS 2003 SE server or an LCS 2005 Enterprise Pool)), but
that is another story.
Server-server communication is done via MTLS and you already knew that.
Yes, this is normal. As for the 2nd question/statement, I am not sure if
that is normal as I have never removed the default TCP transport from the
server. Might be something to test when I get my new home lab configured.
My assumption would be that there is intelligence in LCS to say "if both
transports are removed then default to TCP." One of the MSFT folks or the
MVPs probably have that answer.
Bob
"Jerome" <JeromePeterson> wrote in message
news:uSNEXA$9EHA.3472@TK2MSFTNGP14.phx.gbl...
| Quote: | All,
I am trying to get my two LCS servers to communicate.
i've installed a certificate on both servers, and configured Mutual TLS
transport (5061) Address "ALL"
when i do this my clients can no longer communicate with their assigned
LCS
server. Windows Messenger 5.1 is configured for TCP. The only way i can
get
my clients to connect is by adding ' TCP transport" 5060 to my server
along
with the MTLS.
is this normal? if i don't add MTLS, the clients connect even without
specifying TCP as a transport on my server.
|
|
|
FAQ
Memberlist
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in