| Author |
Message |
Paul MacFarlane
Guest
|
Posted:
Fri Dec 10, 2004 9:38 pm Post subject:
WebServer behind firewall |
|
|
I'm trying to plan for bringing our webserver in-house and had a few
questions about my plan. The idea is to make the server accessible from our
internal network but prevent and secure our network from the outside.
We currently have a firewall (MFW) and internal network 192.168.10.*.
I would forward port 80 through to this webserver.
- Would using a different subnet for the webserver help? (ie 192.168.1.*)
- Would I want to use a second firewall (SFW) (external IP)?
- Would I want to put an internal firewall (IFW) between the webserver and
our network?
Any suggestions or pointer appreciated....
Thanks,
Paul |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Lanwench [MVP - Exchange]
Guest
|
Posted:
Sat Dec 11, 2004 12:03 am Post subject:
Re: WebServer behind firewall |
|
|
Paul MacFarlane wrote:
| Quote: | I'm trying to plan for bringing our webserver in-house and had a few
questions about my plan. The idea is to make the server accessible
from our internal network but prevent and secure our network from the
outside.
We currently have a firewall (MFW) and internal network 192.168.10.*.
I would forward port 80 through to this webserver.
- Would using a different subnet for the webserver help? (ie
192.168.1.*)
- Would I want to use a second firewall (SFW) (external IP)?
- Would I want to put an internal firewall (IFW) between the
webserver and our network?
Any suggestions or pointer appreciated....
Thanks,
Paul
|
I'd put the webserver in a secured DMZ. Don't put it on your LAN. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Paul MacFarlane
Guest
|
Posted:
Sat Dec 11, 2004 12:37 am Post subject:
Re: WebServer behind firewall |
|
|
Would you enable a VPN between them? I'm thinking not...
One of the issues is we want to have access from our website to our SQL
server.
What is the best way of securing that situation? Sql on the webserver
w/Replication?
"Lanwench [MVP - Exchange]"
<lanwench@heybuddy.donotsendme.unsolicitedmail.atyahoo.com> wrote in message
news:eZJSsOu3EHA.1396@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl...
| Quote: | Paul MacFarlane wrote:
I'm trying to plan for bringing our webserver in-house and had a few
questions about my plan. The idea is to make the server accessible
from our internal network but prevent and secure our network from the
outside.
We currently have a firewall (MFW) and internal network 192.168.10.*.
I would forward port 80 through to this webserver.
- Would using a different subnet for the webserver help? (ie
192.168.1.*)
- Would I want to use a second firewall (SFW) (external IP)?
- Would I want to put an internal firewall (IFW) between the
webserver and our network?
Any suggestions or pointer appreciated....
Thanks,
Paul
I'd put the webserver in a secured DMZ. Don't put it on your LAN.
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Steven L Umbach
Guest
|
Posted:
Sat Dec 11, 2004 1:21 am Post subject:
Re: WebServer behind firewall |
|
|
There are a number of ways you can do this. Using two firewalls would be a
good bet. One in front of the web server and one between the lan and the web
server. The one in front of the web server could be configured to allow only
ports 80/443 to the web server and the one between the lan and the web
server would be configured to allow only traffic to and from the lan and the
web server, This way if the web server is compromised, the attacker will
have limited access to your internal network. You could use ipsec to protect
traffic between the web server and the internal lan to encrypt the traffic
and make the firewall easier to configure. Ipsec can use kerberos [within a
domain], certificate, or preshared key machine authentication. You can not
however use ipsec negotiation between a domain controller and a domain
computer. The link below goes into much more detail on possible firewall
configurations. I also strongly urge you to read the Windows 2003 Sever
Security Guide on how to harder servers and it also includes tips on how to
use ipsec "filtering" as another layer of security. --- Steve
http://www.microsoft.com/technet/Security/topics/network/firewall.mspx
"Paul MacFarlane" <pmacfarlane@mullenlaw.com> wrote in message
news:OAupG5s3EHA.3616@TK2MSFTNGP11.phx.gbl...
| Quote: | I'm trying to plan for bringing our webserver in-house and had a few
questions about my plan. The idea is to make the server accessible from
our
internal network but prevent and secure our network from the outside.
We currently have a firewall (MFW) and internal network 192.168.10.*.
I would forward port 80 through to this webserver.
- Would using a different subnet for the webserver help? (ie 192.168.1.*)
- Would I want to use a second firewall (SFW) (external IP)?
- Would I want to put an internal firewall (IFW) between the webserver and
our network?
Any suggestions or pointer appreciated....
Thanks,
Paul
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Paul MacFarlane
Guest
|
Posted:
Sat Dec 11, 2004 5:20 am Post subject:
Re: WebServer behind firewall |
|
|
Thank you much....
"Steven L Umbach" <n9rou@nospam-comcast.net> wrote in message
news:%238e6Xzu3EHA.2568@TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl...
| Quote: | There are a number of ways you can do this. Using two firewalls would be a
good bet. One in front of the web server and one between the lan and the
web
server. The one in front of the web server could be configured to allow
only
ports 80/443 to the web server and the one between the lan and the web
server would be configured to allow only traffic to and from the lan and
the
web server, This way if the web server is compromised, the attacker will
have limited access to your internal network. You could use ipsec to
protect
traffic between the web server and the internal lan to encrypt the traffic
and make the firewall easier to configure. Ipsec can use kerberos [within
a
domain], certificate, or preshared key machine authentication. You can not
however use ipsec negotiation between a domain controller and a domain
computer. The link below goes into much more detail on possible firewall
configurations. I also strongly urge you to read the Windows 2003 Sever
Security Guide on how to harder servers and it also includes tips on how
to
use ipsec "filtering" as another layer of security. --- Steve
http://www.microsoft.com/technet/Security/topics/network/firewall.mspx
"Paul MacFarlane" <pmacfarlane@mullenlaw.com> wrote in message
news:OAupG5s3EHA.3616@TK2MSFTNGP11.phx.gbl...
I'm trying to plan for bringing our webserver in-house and had a few
questions about my plan. The idea is to make the server accessible from
our
internal network but prevent and secure our network from the outside.
We currently have a firewall (MFW) and internal network 192.168.10.*.
I would forward port 80 through to this webserver.
- Would using a different subnet for the webserver help? (ie
192.168.1.*)
- Would I want to use a second firewall (SFW) (external IP)?
- Would I want to put an internal firewall (IFW) between the webserver
and
our network?
Any suggestions or pointer appreciated....
Thanks,
Paul
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Roger Abell
Guest
|
Posted:
Sun Dec 12, 2004 9:27 am Post subject:
Re: WebServer behind firewall |
|
|
You know, it all really depends on the value of the webserver, the
volume of traffic, "visibility" of the website (i.e. attractiveness of
it as a target), etc..
The first thing I noticed is that, as you now have this external at
the ISP, you obviously have no need for it to be internal - it is not
speaking with anything inside now. So, using KISS principle, if
you do not need it inside why put it there and so invite inside the
traffic and any potential bad things that might happen if that box
were compromised ?
--
Roger Abell
Microsoft MVP (Windows Security)
MCSE (W2k3,W2k,Nt4) MCDBA
"Paul MacFarlane" <pmacfarlane@mullenlaw.com> wrote in message
news:OAupG5s3EHA.3616@TK2MSFTNGP11.phx.gbl...
| Quote: | I'm trying to plan for bringing our webserver in-house and had a few
questions about my plan. The idea is to make the server accessible from
our
internal network but prevent and secure our network from the outside.
We currently have a firewall (MFW) and internal network 192.168.10.*.
I would forward port 80 through to this webserver.
- Would using a different subnet for the webserver help? (ie 192.168.1.*)
- Would I want to use a second firewall (SFW) (external IP)?
- Would I want to put an internal firewall (IFW) between the webserver and
our network?
Any suggestions or pointer appreciated....
Thanks,
Paul
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Paul MacFarlane
Guest
|
Posted:
Wed Dec 15, 2004 1:23 am Post subject:
Re: WebServer behind firewall |
|
|
Because we will be needing it inside soon.
We've KISS it a long time and are looking like relics..<g>
More client interaction is in development.
"Roger Abell" <mvpNOSpam@asu.edu> wrote in message
news:OwpjMo$3EHA.2316@TK2MSFTNGP15.phx.gbl...
| Quote: | You know, it all really depends on the value of the webserver, the
volume of traffic, "visibility" of the website (i.e. attractiveness of
it as a target), etc..
The first thing I noticed is that, as you now have this external at
the ISP, you obviously have no need for it to be internal - it is not
speaking with anything inside now. So, using KISS principle, if
you do not need it inside why put it there and so invite inside the
traffic and any potential bad things that might happen if that box
were compromised ?
--
Roger Abell
Microsoft MVP (Windows Security)
MCSE (W2k3,W2k,Nt4) MCDBA
"Paul MacFarlane" <pmacfarlane@mullenlaw.com> wrote in message
news:OAupG5s3EHA.3616@TK2MSFTNGP11.phx.gbl...
I'm trying to plan for bringing our webserver in-house and had a few
questions about my plan. The idea is to make the server accessible from
our
internal network but prevent and secure our network from the outside.
We currently have a firewall (MFW) and internal network 192.168.10.*.
I would forward port 80 through to this webserver.
- Would using a different subnet for the webserver help? (ie
192.168.1.*)
- Would I want to use a second firewall (SFW) (external IP)?
- Would I want to put an internal firewall (IFW) between the webserver
and
our network?
Any suggestions or pointer appreciated....
Thanks,
Paul
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Roger Abell
Guest
|
Posted:
Wed Dec 15, 2004 8:51 am Post subject:
Re: WebServer behind firewall |
|
|
Good you are looking ahead. In that case, I am much like
the others that replied. In the DMZ would be the place,
tcp 80/443 defined in from the world, and only what is
necessary defined from it to other servers for middleware,
backup, etc..
--
Roger Abell
Microsoft MVP (Windows Security)
MCSE (W2k3,W2k,Nt4) MCDBA
"Paul MacFarlane" <pmacfarlane@mullenlaw.com> wrote in message
news:OEBHyJh4EHA.1392@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl...
| Quote: | Because we will be needing it inside soon.
We've KISS it a long time and are looking like relics..<g
More client interaction is in development.
"Roger Abell" <mvpNOSpam@asu.edu> wrote in message
news:OwpjMo$3EHA.2316@TK2MSFTNGP15.phx.gbl...
You know, it all really depends on the value of the webserver, the
volume of traffic, "visibility" of the website (i.e. attractiveness of
it as a target), etc..
The first thing I noticed is that, as you now have this external at
the ISP, you obviously have no need for it to be internal - it is not
speaking with anything inside now. So, using KISS principle, if
you do not need it inside why put it there and so invite inside the
traffic and any potential bad things that might happen if that box
were compromised ?
--
Roger Abell
Microsoft MVP (Windows Security)
MCSE (W2k3,W2k,Nt4) MCDBA
"Paul MacFarlane" <pmacfarlane@mullenlaw.com> wrote in message
news:OAupG5s3EHA.3616@TK2MSFTNGP11.phx.gbl...
I'm trying to plan for bringing our webserver in-house and had a few
questions about my plan. The idea is to make the server accessible
from
our
internal network but prevent and secure our network from the outside.
We currently have a firewall (MFW) and internal network 192.168.10.*.
I would forward port 80 through to this webserver.
- Would using a different subnet for the webserver help? (ie
192.168.1.*)
- Would I want to use a second firewall (SFW) (external IP)?
- Would I want to put an internal firewall (IFW) between the webserver
and
our network?
Any suggestions or pointer appreciated....
Thanks,
Paul
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
|
|